If Facebook 'likes' were votes, the next US president would be...
The answer definitely comes as a bit of shocker in this new analysis of
the current candidates conducted by ESPN-owned political site
FiveThirtyEight.
See all that blue? It shows support for a most unlikely candidate -- at least on Facebook.
Americans aren't known for their turnout at elections, but that's
not to say they're averse to voting. Millions of them vote every single
day in a sense -- by clicking the "like" button on Facebook posts,
profiles and pages.
Now, the folks at FiveThirtyEight, an ESPN-owned site that focuses on polling, politics and more, have created a national map and ranking of the Facebook "likes" for each major candidate in the upcoming US presidential election.
They're calling it the "Facebook Primary," and based on this data alone, the winner is Ben Carson.
That's right, Ben Carson -- the man who has come in last in the first
two Republican presidential primaries and is in an average of eighth
place overall behind his competitors, according to a series of polls
compiled by the Huffington Post.
It's also interesting to see that unlike many of the other candidates
whose Facebook support is restricted to certain geographical regions,
Carson's support on the social media network spreads out pretty evenly
across the country.
To compile their information, computational
journalist Matthew Conlen and visual journalist Reuben Fischer-Baum
analyzed Facebook data beyond simple likes of a single page. If you look
at Trump's page versus Carson's, for example, it looks like Trump is leading in popularity with 5,756,921 likes to Carson's 5,074,982 likes.
"Discrepancies
can be caused by candidates having multiple Facebook pages," Conlen
told CNET's Crave blog. "For example, Bernie Sanders has an official
page for his position as a senator and an official page for his
presidential campaign. For cases like these we aggregate the amount of
total likes for the candidate across the pages and de-duplicate so that
if a person likes both of Sanders' Facebook pages this will only be
counted once."
Slicing the data this way also showed that Bernie
Sanders comes in second place among all candidates, with almost three
times the support of his rival Hillary Clinton, and that after Carson,
Donald Trump trounces the rest of the Republican field.
Of course, there's also another discrepancy -- one between the
Facebook data and what's actually happening in the election. That simply
highlights the fact that getting lots of "likes" doesn't mean anyone
wants you running the country. It's similar to how the "most popular"
winner of yearbook voting in high school was rarely the same person as
the "most likely to succeed." Also, because the Facebook audience and
America at large are different, the results need to be taken with a
proverbial grain of salt.
"Facebook users are disproportionately young (although not as young as
users of other social media networks), low-income and female," Conlen
says in his comments about the map. "And the sample may be even more
skewed because only some people on Facebook have liked a presidential
candidate's page and because those pages haven't existed for the same
amount of time."
Still, it's fun to play around with the interactive map (even if it is a little bit different than our own analysis of the social-media standings of candidates).
You can check and uncheck different candidates at the top of the page
to see how the likes spread out across the nation. And it sounds like
Conlen and Fischer-Baum will continue to update the map as the Facebook
landscape changes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment